The pernicious Multi Culture Fad

The recent spate of violence in France and recent bomb blasts in Britain about being too politically correct regarding multi culturism are opportune moment to discuss this topic. Britain and France have got violence in return of their multi ethnics policies and environment. Multi Culture does not mean that you give any idiot the freedom to do whatever he likes in the subterfuge of his culture. First of all let us be very clear that despite all the utopian arguments all the citizens of a country are not equal. There are rich, there are poor, there is a majority and there is a minority. The first and foremost task of any immigrant is to adapt the host country as his new motherland and inculcate the same feeling and respect he has for his original birth place. Without the unquestionable devotion towards host country we cannot fix the problem of kids blowing themselves up and killing innocent people in the name of jihad. The recent spate of killing in France where "beurs" went berserk killing their countrymen had a deeper malaise than being a simple repercussion of economic inequality. Britain and France are probably the best example to quote of countries which are most tolerant and infact most open regarding multi ethnic cultures and religion. But then let us not pretend that everything is fine in these gestures. Unless the immigrants bring themselves into mainline these sort of violence would continue. The onus is on majority also to make their minority counterparts feel at home. But then deeper dwell into this mess brings up question that why should a majority be considerate towards minority which has immigrated to their country. The majority thinks that why can't minority stay where they are rather than coming to their place and taking away their jobs, increasing their population and exhausting their resources.The incidents like banning of a sikh play in Britain shows the audacity of the sikh community their to get up in arms against authorities. Though sentiments should be taken into account in multi ethnic places but then the sensitivities should be manageable and should not be an impediment towards work being done in those places.

Save as PDF and other PDF antagonists

The pertinent question would be that why people use Acrobat. If they use it mainly to create PDFs then Acrobat could not have stood the onslaught of tones of free PDFMaker. Probably the quality matters to the end user. Therefore Acrobat has an edge over its free counterpart. But then may be the sales of Acrobat are coming more from the Creative Professionals rather than the Business Group.

Though we know that Business Users form a large chunk of Acrobat users but who are these Business Users. If they are the normal organizations executives then I am sure that sooner or later they would come to realize that Acrobat does not give that much of value for money. But at the same time if they are voracious user of Documents then Acrobat indeed have a critical role to play.

The save as PDF option in the coming Office 12 suite would target these casual PDF users who might be forming a considerable chunk of Acrobat users. All people like using jazzy softwares but then those times are gone where the CIOs used to have a free hand in implementing the best software for the people. Now is the time for good enough software which is more affordable than its counterpart. Here lies the importance of open office which is going to dent the document market for sure. The MA Common Wealth ruling is the first example for that and I am sure many more will follow.

Moreover OpenOffice suit is less buggy now. But a quagmire for OpenOffice guys is their revenue model which cannot be sustained unless they are funded by some angel investors. Most of the big corporations like Sun who were the harbingers of this OpenSouce movement have brought out their own softwares which ironically play against the OpenSource community.

Ignorance in USA

Most often we hear that how ignorant the people of USA are about the rest of the world. There world starts and ends in USA itself. But then a detailed analysis would make it clear that it is not their fault. For centuries USA has been the bastion for all the economic progress and great industries. Due to the helpful laws and transparent system the industries thrived there. You have all the great management institutes there having a heavily biased USA based study material. They should not be blamed either as there were hardly any growth outside USA when these institutes were getting formed and it was quite obvious that the whole management business became pro USA. But time has changed now. USA is seeing a metamorphosis unseen in its history. People are forced to give away their jobs to lower wages country. Now they have suddenly realized that the tunnel vision they had about the rest of the world is detrimental to their existence. There are fewer enrollments in their MBA and MS courses as people from China and India who were the biggest numbers are finding quality education in their own country. The challenge for USA is to gear up for this change. Rather getting blinded by the obvious it needs to show the world that it still has the depth and potential to be cynosure for investments and education. The road is tough ahead but I am sure USA will tread it and will come out as a winner.